@InProceedings{EspinosaSarmientoPadiAlve:2018:EsGeIn,
author = "Espinosa Sarmiento, Karen Viviana and Padilha, Ant{\^o}nio Lopes
and Alves, Livia Ribeiro",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Estimation of geomagnetically Induced Currents at Low Latitude and
Equatorial regions of Brazil during two great magnetic storms of
2015",
year = "2018",
organization = "AGU Fall Meeting",
abstract = "The South American longitudinal sector presents the unique feature
of the presence of daytime equatorial electrojet currents (EEJ)
and the South Atlantic Magnetic Anomaly (SAMA), where the global
minimum intensity of the geomagnetic field is observed. Enhanced
amplitudes are observed in the horizontal magnetic components
recorded on the ground within the areas of influence of both the
EEJ and the SAMA and therefore it is expected that significant
enhancements of GIC magnitude also occur in these regions. We use
here geomagnetic field variations data recorded by fluxgate
magnetometers from the Brazilian space weather program (EMBRACE)
to evaluate GIC effects during two strong geomagnetic storms in
March (Dst = \−222nT) and June (Dst = \−204nT) 2015.
Among the available geomagnetic stations, we selected those with
information about the underground electrical conductivity
structure and that can be approximated by 1-D models for
calculation of the geoelectric field. GIC levels are estimated
using a realistic local power grid model located in the central
region of Brazil, artificially moved to the sites where the
geomagnetic measurements are available. Maximum GIC amplitude of
about 8 A was estimated at an equatorial station positioned over
high resistivity underground, associated with the arrival of an
interplanetary pressure pulse just behind two other pulses during
the June storm. The results are also interpreted in terms of the
ionospheric currents over the measurement sites and the
conductivity distribution beneath these sites. It is observed that
both EEJ and SAMA increase the GIC amplitudes, with the greatest
effects associated with EEJ. In relation to the underlying
conductivity structure, the higher GIC effects are associated with
low conductance at crustal depths, with upper mantle depths
showing minor effect.",
conference-location = "Washington, D. C.",
conference-year = "10-14 dec.",
language = "en",
targetfile = "espinosa_estimation.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}